Overall score
Archerfield
43.5/100
Salisbury
71.9/100
Archerfield vs Salisbury, QLD suburb comparison
Salisbury for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ArcherfieldSalisbury
Crime rate
Archerfield
93.2 / 1k
Salisbury
38.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Archerfield
85
Salisbury
187
Population
Archerfield
533
Salisbury
6,790
Metric leadArcherfield 0Salisbury 91 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Archerfield | Salisbury |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.5/100 | 71.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 93.2 / 1k | 38.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 40 |
| Walkability | 26.5/100 | 96.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 85 | 187 |
| Population | 533 | 6,790 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Archerfield is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Salisbury is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Archerfield sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Salisbury is closer to the city centre.
Archerfield pulls ahead on relatively affordable housing and good access to parks, whereas Salisbury is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. On housing, Archerfield sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Salisbury.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Salisbury, while Archerfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.