Ashgrove vs Paddington, QLD suburb comparison

Ashgrove for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AshgrovePaddington

Overall score

Ashgrove

86.7/100

Paddington

64.4/100

Crime rate

Ashgrove

19.8 / 1k

Paddington

49.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ashgrove

719

Paddington

301

Population

Ashgrove

13,450

Paddington

9,063

Metric leadAshgrove 7Paddington 12 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAshgrovePaddington
Overall score86.7/10064.4/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10039.2/100
Crime rate19.8 / 1k49.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools914
Parks & reserves268
Public transport stops7948
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities719301
Planning activity1
Population13,4509,063
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Ashgrove is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Paddington is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Ashgrove is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Paddington answers with a busy dining and café scene and excellent public transport.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Ashgrove, while Paddington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons