Overall score
Auburn
62.6/100
Mount Gambier
67.1/100
Mount Gambier for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Auburn
62.6/100
Mount Gambier
67.1/100
Crime rate
Auburn
58.7 / 1k
Mount Gambier
67.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Auburn
312
Mount Gambier
554
Population
Auburn
39,333
Mount Gambier
25,591
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Auburn | Mount Gambier |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.6/100 | 67.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 19.4/100 | 55.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 58.7 / 1k | 67.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 16 | 20 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | — |
| Public transport stops | 309 | 121 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 312 | 554 |
| Planning activity | 57 | 198 |
| Population | 39,333 | 25,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Across states, Auburn is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Mount Gambier is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Gambier sits among greener hillside streets, while Auburn keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Auburn pulls ahead on public transport access and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mount Gambier is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mount Gambier, while Auburn remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.