Overall score
Auburn
34.7/100
Stanley Flat
35.5/100
Auburn vs Stanley Flat, SA suburb comparison
Auburn for investment and value; Stanley Flat for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AuburnStanley Flat
Crime rate
Auburn
15.9 / 1k
Stanley Flat
2.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Auburn
25
Stanley Flat
0
Population
Auburn
668
Stanley Flat
401
Metric leadAuburn 4Stanley Flat 4across 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesStanley Flat
- Best for familiesStanley Flat
- Best for investmentAuburn
- Best for best valueAuburn
- Best for best schoolsAuburn
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Auburn | Stanley Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.7/100 | 35.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 32.9/100 | 23.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 15.9 / 1k | 2.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Public transport stops | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 43.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 25 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 8 |
| Population | 668 | 401 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Auburn is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Stanley Flat is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Auburn sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Stanley Flat is further into the wider countryside.
Auburn tends to lead on housing affordability and walkability, while Stanley Flat stands out for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Auburn if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Stanley Flat for retirees and families.