Overall score
Battery Point
60.6/100
Mount Stuart
56.1/100
Battery Point for families and schools; Mount Stuart for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Battery Point
60.6/100
Mount Stuart
56.1/100
Crime rate
Battery Point
2252.4 / 1k
Mount Stuart
2106.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Battery Point
250
Mount Stuart
43
Population
Battery Point
2,096
Mount Stuart
2,444
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Battery Point | Mount Stuart |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.6/100 | 56.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 2.9/100 | 37.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 2252.4 / 1k | 2106.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 20 |
| Walkability | 74.5/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 250 | 43 |
| Population | 2,096 | 2,444 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Battery Point is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Mount Stuart is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Stuart sits among greener hillside streets, while Battery Point keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Battery Point is stronger for parks and reserves and walkability; Mount Stuart answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Mount Stuart, while Battery Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.