Overall score
Bentley Park
43.6/100
Mount Sheridan
60.1/100
Mount Sheridan for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bentley Park
43.6/100
Mount Sheridan
60.1/100
Crime rate
Bentley Park
78.1 / 1k
Mount Sheridan
65.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bentley Park
45
Mount Sheridan
99
Population
Bentley Park
8,360
Mount Sheridan
8,678
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bentley Park | Mount Sheridan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.6/100 | 60.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 78.1 / 1k | 65.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 22 | 21 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 49.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 45 | 99 |
| Population | 8,360 | 8,678 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Bentley Park is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Mount Sheridan is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Sheridan sits among greener hillside streets, while Bentley Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bentley Park tends to lead on parks and reserves, while Mount Sheridan stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability. On housing, Bentley Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Sheridan.
Households prioritising schools may find Bentley Park the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mount Sheridan.