Bicheno vs Lorne suburb comparison (TAS vs VIC)

Lorne for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BichenoLorne

Overall score

Bicheno

24.2/100

Lorne

31.8/100

Crime rate

Bicheno

821.5 / 1k

Lorne

56.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bicheno

0

Lorne

1

Population

Bicheno

1,049

Lorne

1,327

Metric leadBicheno 2Lorne 53 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

  • Best for retireesLorne
  • Best for beach lifestyleLorne
  • Best for investmentLorne

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBichenoLorne
Overall score24.2/10031.8/100
Housing (desirability)10.6/1006.8/100
Crime rate821.5 / 1k56.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves32
Public transport stops44
Walkability6.0/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities01
Planning activity127
Population1,0491,327
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/108/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Bicheno is a beachside smaller community where the coast sets the tone, whereas Lorne is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Bicheno sits more remote from the capital, whereas Lorne is on a more distant stretch of coast.

On the data, Bicheno is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; Lorne answers with a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities. Bicheno generally means more approachable housing costs, while Lorne leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and people chasing a beach lifestyle are more likely to prefer Lorne, while Bicheno remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons