Overall score
Birmingham Gardens
42.2/100
Wallsend
65.4/100
Wallsend for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Birmingham Gardens
42.2/100
Wallsend
65.4/100
Crime rate
Birmingham Gardens
59.8 / 1k
Wallsend
59.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Birmingham Gardens
31
Wallsend
293
Population
Birmingham Gardens
2,598
Wallsend
13,244
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Birmingham Gardens | Wallsend |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.2/100 | 65.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.7/100 | 66.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.8 / 1k | 59.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 50 | 202 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 31 | 293 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 46 |
| Population | 2,598 | 13,244 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Birmingham Gardens is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, while Wallsend is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Birmingham Gardens sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Wallsend is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Birmingham Gardens is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Wallsend answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves. Birmingham Gardens generally means more sought-after housing, while Wallsend leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Wallsend, while Birmingham Gardens remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.