Birmingham Gardens vs Wallsend, NSW suburb comparison

Wallsend for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Birmingham GardensWallsend

Overall score

Birmingham Gardens

42.2/100

Wallsend

65.4/100

Crime rate

Birmingham Gardens

59.8 / 1k

Wallsend

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Birmingham Gardens

31

Wallsend

293

Population

Birmingham Gardens

2,598

Wallsend

13,244

Metric leadBirmingham Gardens 3Wallsend 8across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBirmingham GardensWallsend
Overall score42.2/10065.4/100
Housing (desirability)49.7/10066.7/100
Crime rate59.8 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools86
Parks & reserves122
Public transport stops50202
Walkability30.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities31293
Planning activity1346
Population2,59813,244
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/103/10

Comparison summary

Birmingham Gardens is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, while Wallsend is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Birmingham Gardens sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Wallsend is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Birmingham Gardens is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Wallsend answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves. Birmingham Gardens generally means more sought-after housing, while Wallsend leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Wallsend, while Birmingham Gardens remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons