Birmingham Gardens vs Wallsend, NSW Suburb Comparison

Wallsend for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Birmingham GardensWallsend

Overall score

Birmingham Gardens

35.4/100

Wallsend

54.6/100

Crime rate

Birmingham Gardens

59.8 / 1k

Wallsend

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Birmingham Gardens

36

Wallsend

302

Population

Birmingham Gardens

2,598

Wallsend

13,244

Metric leadBirmingham Gardens 3Wallsend 91 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBirmingham GardensWallsend
Overall score35.4/10054.6/100
Housing (desirability)47.8/10073.8/100
Crime rate59.8 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools86
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves122
Public transport stops50202
Walkability30.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities36302
Planning activity1660
Green cover8.1%35.3%
Population2,59813,244
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/103/10

Comparison summary

Birmingham Gardens is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Wallsend is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Birmingham Gardens sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Wallsend is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Birmingham Gardens is stronger for schools and education options, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Wallsend answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Wallsend, while Birmingham Gardens remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons