Braddon vs Queanbeyan Suburb Comparison (ACT vs NSW)

Braddon for schools; Queanbeyan for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BraddonQueanbeyan

Overall score

Braddon

54.1/100

Queanbeyan

53.4/100

Crime rate

Braddon

61.0 / 1k

Queanbeyan

61.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Braddon

288

Queanbeyan

301

Population

Braddon

6,383

Queanbeyan

6,409

Metric leadBraddon 4Queanbeyan 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBraddonQueanbeyan
Overall score54.1/10053.4/100
Housing (desirability)50.4/10054.9/100
Crime rate61.0 / 1k61.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools89
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves—8
Public transport stops—66
Walkability85.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities288301
Planning activity530
Green cover1.5%4.7%
Population6,3836,409
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/106/10

Comparison summary

Braddon (ACT) is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Queanbeyan (NSW) is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Braddon sits closer to the city centre, whereas Queanbeyan is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Braddon is stronger for a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook; Queanbeyan answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability.

Braddon suits retirees, families, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Queanbeyan is the stronger match for value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons