Brookfield vs Kenmore Hills, QLD suburb comparison

Brookfield for investment and value; Kenmore Hills for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BrookfieldKenmore Hills

Overall score

Brookfield

58.3/100

Kenmore Hills

51.0/100

Crime rate

Brookfield

9.2 / 1k

Kenmore Hills

9.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Brookfield

51

Kenmore Hills

39

Population

Brookfield

3,640

Kenmore Hills

2,448

Metric leadBrookfield 8Kenmore Hills 11 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBrookfieldKenmore Hills
Overall score58.3/10051.0/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10042.4/100
Crime rate9.2 / 1k9.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools15
Parks & reserves82
Public transport stops1615
Walkability24.0/10022.5/100
Nearby amenities5139
Population3,6402,448
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Brookfield reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Kenmore Hills is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Kenmore Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Brookfield keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Brookfield pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Kenmore Hills is the better pick for an affluent, sought-after address and improving crime trends.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Brookfield, while Kenmore Hills remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons