Callaghan vs Sandgate, NSW suburb comparison

Callaghan for families and value; Sandgate for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CallaghanSandgate

Overall score

Callaghan

40.8/100

Sandgate

25.1/100

Crime rate

Callaghan

82.1 / 1k

Sandgate

109.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Callaghan

1,218

Sandgate

30

Population

Callaghan

1,358

Sandgate

276

Metric leadCallaghan 7Sandgate 1across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCallaghanSandgate
Overall score40.8/10025.1/100
Housing (desirability)35.7/100
Crime rate82.1 / 1k109.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools102
Parks & reserves5
Public transport stops2126
Walkability67.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities1,21830
Planning activity45
Population1,358276
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/10

Comparison summary

Callaghan is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Sandgate is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Callaghan sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Sandgate is further out with more breathing room.

Callaghan tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, while Sandgate stands out for public transport access. Callaghan generally means more mid-market housing value, while Sandgate leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Callaghan suits families and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Sandgate is the stronger match for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons