Canning Vale vs Parkwood, WA suburb comparison

Canning Vale for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Canning ValeParkwood

Overall score

Canning Vale

72.8/100

Parkwood

61.1/100

Crime rate

Canning Vale

349.6 / 1k

Parkwood

2131.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Canning Vale

235

Parkwood

110

Population

Canning Vale

34,504

Parkwood

5,995

Metric leadCanning Vale 9Parkwood 01 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCanning ValeParkwood
Overall score72.8/10061.1/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10047.6/100
Crime rate349.6 / 1k2131.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools77
Parks & reserves658
Public transport stops19346
Walkability96.0/10081.0/100
Nearby amenities235110
Population34,5045,995
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/106/10

Comparison summary

Canning Vale reads as an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Parkwood is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Canning Vale pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Parkwood is the better pick for excellent public transport and improving crime trends.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Canning Vale, while Parkwood remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons