Overall score
Carrington
43.4/100
Cooks Hill
48.5/100
Carrington for value; Cooks Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Carrington
43.4/100
Cooks Hill
48.5/100
Crime rate
Carrington
149.0 / 1k
Cooks Hill
217.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Carrington
79
Cooks Hill
281
Population
Carrington
2,061
Cooks Hill
3,774
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Carrington | Cooks Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.4/100 | 48.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.7/100 | 12.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 149.0 / 1k | 217.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 36 | 28 |
| Walkability | 48.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 79 | 281 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 17 |
| Population | 2,061 | 3,774 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Carrington reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Cooks Hill is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Carrington pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Cooks Hill is the better pick for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Carrington, while Cooks Hill remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.