Castle Hill vs Devonport suburb comparison (NSW vs TAS)
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Castle Hill | Devonport |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 77.3/100 | 72.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.8/100 | 73.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.2 / 1k | — |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 28 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 497 | 73 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 530 | 321 |
| Planning activity | 104 | — |
| Population | 40,874 | 14,481 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 1/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesCastle Hill
- Best for familiesCastle Hill
- Best for investmentDevonport
- Best for best valueDevonport
- Best for best schoolsCastle Hill
Comparison summary
Across states, Castle Hill is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Devonport is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Castle Hill sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Devonport is further into the wider countryside.
Castle Hill tends to lead on schools and education options and parks and reserves, while Devonport stands out for housing affordability. Castle Hill generally means more sought-after housing, while Devonport leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Castle Hill suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Devonport is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.