Overall score
Castle Hill
39.8/100
Hyde Park
46.4/100
Castle Hill vs Hyde Park, QLD suburb comparison
Castle Hill for retirees and investment; Hyde Park for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Castle HillHyde Park
Crime rate
Castle Hill
190.2 / 1k
Hyde Park
121.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Castle Hill
97
Hyde Park
29
Population
Castle Hill
972
Hyde Park
1,374
Metric leadCastle Hill 3Hyde Park 42 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesCastle Hill
- Best for familiesHyde Park
- Best for investmentCastle Hill
- Best for best valueCastle Hill
- Best for best schoolsHyde Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Castle Hill | Hyde Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.8/100 | 46.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.8/100 | 39.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 190.2 / 1k | 121.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 97 | 29 |
| Population | 972 | 1,374 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Castle Hill reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; Hyde Park is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Castle Hill pulls ahead on housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Hyde Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and walkability. Castle Hill generally means more sought-after housing, while Hyde Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees and investors may find Castle Hill the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hyde Park.