Overall score
Casuarina
47.5/100
Nightcliff
54.9/100
Casuarina vs Nightcliff, NT suburb comparison
Nightcliff for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CasuarinaNightcliff
Nearby amenities
Casuarina
341
Nightcliff
149
Population
Casuarina
406
Nightcliff
3,884
Metric leadCasuarina 3Nightcliff 41 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesNightcliff
- Best for investmentNightcliff
- Best for best valueNightcliff
- Best for best schoolsNightcliff
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Casuarina | Nightcliff |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.5/100 | 54.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 0.5/100 | 17.2/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 11 |
| Walkability | 79.0/100 | 53.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 341 | 149 |
| Population | 406 | 3,884 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Casuarina reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Nightcliff is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Casuarina is stronger for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities; Nightcliff answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Nightcliff, while Casuarina remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.