Overall score
Cavendish
33.8/100
Hamilton
68.0/100
Cavendish for retirees; Hamilton for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cavendish
33.8/100
Hamilton
68.0/100
Crime rate
Cavendish
13.9 / 1k
Hamilton
112.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cavendish
0
Hamilton
269
Population
Cavendish
366
Hamilton
10,346
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cavendish | Hamilton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.8/100 | 68.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.8/100 | 71.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 13.9 / 1k | 112.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 14 |
| Public transport stops | — | 73 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 269 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 20 |
| Population | 366 | 10,346 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 3/10 |
Cavendish reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Hamilton is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace. Cavendish sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Hamilton is more regionally self-contained.
Cavendish tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Hamilton stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options. Cavendish generally means more mid-market housing value, while Hamilton leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Cavendish suits retirees more clearly, whereas Hamilton is the stronger match for families and investors.