Overall score
Clarence Gardens
47.1/100
Kingswood
47.0/100
Clarence Gardens for retirees and investment; Kingswood for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clarence Gardens
47.1/100
Kingswood
47.0/100
Crime rate
Clarence Gardens
35.9 / 1k
Kingswood
47.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clarence Gardens
81
Kingswood
62
Population
Clarence Gardens
2,373
Kingswood
2,554
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clarence Gardens | Kingswood |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.1/100 | 47.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.9/100 | 37.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 35.9 / 1k | 47.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 19 |
| Walkability | 26.0/100 | 30.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 81 | 62 |
| Planning activity | 39 | 29 |
| Population | 2,373 | 2,554 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Clarence Gardens is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, and Kingswood is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Clarence Gardens pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Kingswood is the better pick for schools and education options and public transport access.
Retirees and investors may find Clarence Gardens the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kingswood.