Overall score
Clarence Park
44.3/100
Highgate
50.3/100
Highgate for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clarence Park
44.3/100
Highgate
50.3/100
Crime rate
Clarence Park
43.7 / 1k
Highgate
16.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clarence Park
83
Highgate
40
Population
Clarence Park
2,658
Highgate
1,504
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clarence Park | Highgate |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.3/100 | 50.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 28.8/100 | 35.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.7 / 1k | 16.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 11 | 7 |
| Walkability | 22.5/100 | 12.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 83 | 40 |
| Planning activity | 28 | 14 |
| Population | 2,658 | 1,504 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Clarence Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Highgate is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.
Clarence Park tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Highgate stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Investors may find Clarence Park the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Highgate.