Overall score
Clontarf
65.6/100
Griffin
57.0/100
Clontarf vs Griffin, QLD suburb comparison
Clontarf for beach lifestyle and value; Griffin for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ClontarfGriffin
Crime rate
Clontarf
53.0 / 1k
Griffin
29.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clontarf
222
Griffin
49
Population
Clontarf
8,446
Griffin
12,295
Metric leadClontarf 6Griffin 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Clontarf is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone, while Griffin is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone. Clontarf sits firmly coastal, whereas Griffin is near both coast and city.
Clontarf pulls ahead on schools and education options and parks and reserves, whereas Griffin is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community. Clontarf generally means more approachable housing costs, while Griffin leans toward more sought-after housing.
Clontarf suits people chasing a beach lifestyle and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Griffin is the stronger match for retirees and families.