Croydon vs Flinders Park, SA suburb comparison

Flinders Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CroydonFlinders Park

Overall score

Croydon

41.2/100

Flinders Park

53.8/100

Crime rate

Croydon

71.5 / 1k

Flinders Park

30.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Croydon

73

Flinders Park

100

Population

Croydon

1,220

Flinders Park

5,489

Metric leadCroydon 2Flinders Park 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCroydonFlinders Park
Overall score41.2/10053.8/100
Housing (desirability)29.4/10053.5/100
Crime rate71.5 / 1k30.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools6
Public transport stops625
Walkability19.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities73100
Planning activity1771
Population1,2205,489
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Croydon reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Flinders Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Croydon is stronger for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Flinders Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Flinders Park, while Croydon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons