Overall score
Daw Park
45.4/100
St Marys
53.8/100
Daw Park for retirees; St Marys for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Daw Park
45.4/100
St Marys
53.8/100
Crime rate
Daw Park
23.1 / 1k
St Marys
0.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Daw Park
76
St Marys
131
Population
Daw Park
2,705
St Marys
3,010
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Daw Park | St Marys |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.4/100 | 53.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 31.3/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.1 / 1k | 0.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 17 |
| Walkability | 53.5/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 76 | 131 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 38 |
| Population | 2,705 | 3,010 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 6/10 |
Daw Park reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; St Marys is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Daw Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas St Marys is the better pick for housing affordability and public transport access.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer St Marys, while Daw Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.