Overall score
Devon Hills
30.2/100
Longford
54.3/100
Devon Hills for retirees and investment; Longford for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Devon Hills
30.2/100
Longford
54.3/100
Crime rate
Devon Hills
2775.0 / 1k
Longford
271.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Devon Hills
0
Longford
43
Population
Devon Hills
434
Longford
4,268
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Devon Hills | Longford |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.2/100 | 54.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 75.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 2775.0 / 1k | 271.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 14 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 73.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 43 |
| Population | 434 | 4,268 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 2/10 |
Devon Hills is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Longford is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Devon Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Longford keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Devon Hills is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Longford answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access. On housing, Devon Hills sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Longford.
Devon Hills suits investors more clearly, whereas Longford is the stronger match for retirees and families.