Drysdale vs Portarlington, VIC Suburb Comparison

Drysdale for investment and value; Portarlington for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DrysdalePortarlington

Overall score

Drysdale

47.5/100

Portarlington

48.5/100

Crime rate

Drysdale

40.2 / 1k

Portarlington

30.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Drysdale

7

Portarlington

9

Population

Drysdale

4,976

Portarlington

4,436

Metric leadDrysdale 5Portarlington 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDrysdalePortarlington
Overall score47.5/10048.5/100
Housing (desirability)61.2/10042.3/100
Crime rate40.2 / 1k30.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools41
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves49
Public transport stops3136
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities79
Planning activity83104
Green cover0.7%4.9%
Population4,9764,436
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/104/10

Comparison summary

Drysdale is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone, while Portarlington is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.

Drysdale tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and overall desirability, while Portarlington stands out for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Drysdale, while Portarlington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons