Overall score
Drysdale
47.5/100
Portarlington
48.5/100
Drysdale for investment and value; Portarlington for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Drysdale
47.5/100
Portarlington
48.5/100
Crime rate
Drysdale
40.2 / 1k
Portarlington
30.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Drysdale
7
Portarlington
9
Population
Drysdale
4,976
Portarlington
4,436
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Drysdale | Portarlington |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.5/100 | 48.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.2/100 | 42.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.2 / 1k | 30.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 31 | 36 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 9 |
| Planning activity | 83 | 104 |
| Green cover | 0.7% | 4.9% |
| Population | 4,976 | 4,436 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 4/10 |
Drysdale is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone, while Portarlington is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.
Drysdale tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and overall desirability, while Portarlington stands out for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
On balance, retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Drysdale, while Portarlington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.