Overall score
Dynnyrne
44.6/100
North Hobart
53.5/100
Dynnyrne vs North Hobart, TAS Suburb Comparison
Dynnyrne for families and value; North Hobart for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
DynnyrneNorth Hobart
Crime rate
Dynnyrne
87.2 / 1k
North Hobart
87.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dynnyrne
37
North Hobart
133
Population
Dynnyrne
1,633
North Hobart
2,600
Metric leadDynnyrne 1North Hobart 74 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesDynnyrne
- Best for investmentNorth Hobart
- Best for best valueDynnyrne
- Best for best schoolsDynnyrne
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dynnyrne | North Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.6/100 | 53.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 32.9/100 | 53.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 87.2 / 1k | 87.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 23 |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 37 | 133 |
| Green cover | 10.0% | 0.6% |
| Population | 1,633 | 2,600 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Dynnyrne reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; North Hobart is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Dynnyrne is stronger for housing affordability; North Hobart answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.
Dynnyrne suits families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas North Hobart is the stronger match for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.