Dysart vs Oatlands, TAS suburb comparison

Dysart for retirees and families; Oatlands for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DysartOatlands

Overall score

Dysart

46.5/100

Oatlands

28.0/100

Crime rate

Dysart

14619.9 / 1k

Oatlands

5064.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dysart

1

Oatlands

0

Population

Dysart

252

Oatlands

728

Metric leadDysart 4Oatlands 31 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDysartOatlands
Overall score46.5/10028.0/100
Housing (desirability)69.8/10027.1/100
Crime rate14619.9 / 1k5064.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves22
Public transport stops2
Walkability0.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities10
Population252728
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Dysart is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Oatlands is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Dysart tends to lead on housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Oatlands stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability.

Choose Dysart if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Oatlands for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons