Eastwood vs Mount Taylor, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Eastwood | Mount Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.8/100 | 34.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 85.2/100 | 33.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 35.7 / 1k | 9.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | — |
| Walkability | 48.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 10 |
| Population | 2,855 | 330 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 6/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesMount Taylor
- Best for familiesMount Taylor
- Best for investmentEastwood
- Best for best valueEastwood
- Best for best schoolsEastwood
Comparison summary
Eastwood reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Mount Taylor is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Taylor sits among greener hillside streets, while Eastwood keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Eastwood pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Mount Taylor is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
Eastwood suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mount Taylor is the stronger match for retirees and families.