Overall score
Eastwood
52.7/100
Mount Taylor
34.6/100
Eastwood vs Mount Taylor, VIC suburb comparison
Eastwood for investment and value; Mount Taylor for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
EastwoodMount Taylor
Crime rate
Eastwood
33.7 / 1k
Mount Taylor
8.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Eastwood
26
Mount Taylor
0
Population
Eastwood
2,855
Mount Taylor
330
Metric leadEastwood 5Mount Taylor 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMount Taylor
- Best for familiesMount Taylor
- Best for investmentEastwood
- Best for best valueEastwood
- Best for best schoolsEastwood
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Eastwood | Mount Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.7/100 | 34.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 85.2/100 | 33.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.7 / 1k | 8.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | — |
| Walkability | 48.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 10 |
| Population | 2,855 | 330 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Eastwood reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Mount Taylor is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Taylor sits among greener hillside streets, while Eastwood keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Eastwood pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Mount Taylor is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
Eastwood suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mount Taylor is the stronger match for retirees and families.