Emerald vs Longreach, QLD suburb comparison

Emerald for schools; Longreach for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EmeraldLongreach

Overall score

Emerald

42.7/100

Longreach

44.8/100

Crime rate

Emerald

58.1 / 1k

Longreach

57.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Emerald

0

Longreach

0

Population

Emerald

14,904

Longreach

3,124

Metric leadEmerald 4Longreach 23 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEmeraldLongreach
Overall score42.7/10044.8/100
Housing (desirability)27.1/10024.9/100
Crime rate58.1 / 1k57.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools104
Parks & reserves2715
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Population14,9043,124
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Emerald is a slower-paced established suburb with open surrounds, while Longreach is a quieter mid-sized suburb with space and a country-town pace. Emerald sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Longreach is more remote from the capital.

On the data, Emerald is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Longreach answers with a quieter safety profile and overall desirability. Emerald generally means more sought-after housing, while Longreach leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Households prioritising schools may find Emerald the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Longreach.

Related comparisons