Fingal vs Scamander, TAS suburb comparison

Fingal for investment and value; Scamander for beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FingalScamander

Overall score

Fingal

28.0/100

Scamander

23.3/100

Crime rate

Fingal

707.2 / 1k

Scamander

384.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fingal

0

Scamander

36

Population

Fingal

431

Scamander

803

Metric leadFingal 2Scamander 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFingalScamander
Overall score28.0/10023.3/100
Housing (desirability)79.7/10025.5/100
Crime rate707.2 / 1k384.4 / 1k
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops24
Walkability3.0/1008.0/100
Nearby amenities036
Population431803
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Fingal is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Scamander is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Where Scamander is shaped by the coast, Fingal offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Fingal is stronger for housing affordability and overall desirability; Scamander answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Fingal the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle are more likely to prefer Scamander.

Related comparisons