Overall score
Frankston
72.3/100
Seaford
76.7/100
Seaford for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Frankston
72.3/100
Seaford
76.7/100
Crime rate
Frankston
230.8 / 1k
Seaford
135.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Frankston
336
Seaford
369
Population
Frankston
37,331
Seaford
17,215
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Frankston | Seaford |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 72.3/100 | 76.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 67.6/100 | 63.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 230.8 / 1k | 135.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 31 | 14 |
| Public transport stops | 235 | 109 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 336 | 369 |
| Planning activity | 177 | 159 |
| Population | 37,331 | 17,215 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 5/10 |
Frankston is a beachside larger suburb where the coast sets the tone, while Seaford is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.
Frankston tends to lead on housing affordability and schools and education options, while Seaford stands out for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Seaford, while Frankston remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.