Fulham vs Rosedale, VIC suburb comparison

Fulham for retirees; Rosedale for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FulhamRosedale

Overall score

Fulham

28.4/100

Rosedale

34.9/100

Crime rate

Fulham

94.0 / 1k

Rosedale

169.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fulham

1

Rosedale

0

Population

Fulham

994

Rosedale

1,729

Metric leadFulham 4Rosedale 4across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFulhamRosedale
Overall score28.4/10034.9/100
Housing (desirability)57.0/10076.6/100
Crime rate94.0 / 1k169.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops4
Walkability0.0/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities10
Planning activity418
Population9941,729
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/102/10

Comparison summary

Fulham is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Rosedale is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Fulham tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook, while Rosedale stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Fulham generally means more mid-market housing value, while Rosedale leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees may find Fulham the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Rosedale.

Related comparisons