Gordon vs Claremont suburb comparison (ACT vs TAS)

Gordon for retirees and families; Claremont for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GordonClaremont

Overall score

Gordon

55.0/100

Claremont

53.6/100

Crime rate

Gordon

7.8 / 1k

Claremont

449.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gordon

77

Claremont

42

Population

Gordon

7,892

Claremont

8,397

Metric leadGordon 6Claremont 11 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGordonClaremont
Overall score55.0/10053.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate7.8 / 1k449.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools51
Parks & reserves5
Public transport stops71
Walkability57.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities7742
Planning activity1
Population7,8928,397
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/102/10

Comparison summary

Gordon (ACT) is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Claremont (TAS) is a practical metro established suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm.

On the data, Gordon is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Claremont answers with a larger local community. Gordon generally means more sought-after housing, while Claremont leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Gordon if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Claremont for investors.

Related comparisons