Gordon vs Claremont suburb comparison (ACT vs TAS)
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Gordon | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.4/100 | 48.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 3.5 / 1k | — |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 5 |
| Public transport stops | — | 71 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 77 | 42 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 7,892 | 8,397 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 2/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Gordon (ACT) is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Claremont (TAS) is a practical metro established suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm.
On the data, Gordon is stronger for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities; Claremont answers with schools and education options and a larger local community. Gordon generally means more sought-after housing, while Claremont leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Gordon if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Claremont for investors and households prioritising schools.