Overall score
Haddon
44.7/100
Smythesdale
52.4/100
Haddon for retirees and families; Smythesdale for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Haddon
44.7/100
Smythesdale
52.4/100
Crime rate
Haddon
25.2 / 1k
Smythesdale
44.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Haddon
0
Smythesdale
65
Population
Haddon
1,276
Smythesdale
1,189
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Haddon | Smythesdale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.7/100 | 52.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 84.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 25.2 / 1k | 44.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 4 |
| Walkability | 6.0/100 | 52.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 65 |
| Planning activity | 21 | 24 |
| Population | 1,276 | 1,189 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 4/10 |
Haddon reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Smythesdale is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Haddon tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Smythesdale stands out for parks and reserves and walkability.
Haddon suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Smythesdale is the stronger match for investors.