Overall score
Hassall Grove
43.1/100
Marsden Park
47.6/100
Hassall Grove vs Marsden Park, NSW Suburb Comparison
Hassall Grove for families; Marsden Park for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Hassall GroveMarsden Park
Crime rate
Hassall Grove
42.6 / 1k
Marsden Park
39.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hassall Grove
53
Marsden Park
197
Population
Hassall Grove
4,401
Marsden Park
14,610
Metric leadHassall Grove 4Marsden Park 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesHassall Grove
- Best for best schoolsMarsden Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hassall Grove | Marsden Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.1/100 | 47.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.8/100 | 39.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.6 / 1k | 39.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 42 | 123 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 53 | 197 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 71 |
| Green cover | 15.2% | 8.8% |
| Population | 4,401 | 14,610 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Hassall Grove is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Marsden Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Hassall Grove tends to lead on schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook, while Marsden Park stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.
Choose Hassall Grove if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Marsden Park for retirees and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.