Overall score
Hassall Grove
50.8/100
Marsden Park
56.9/100
Hassall Grove for schools; Marsden Park for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Hassall Grove
50.8/100
Marsden Park
56.9/100
Crime rate
Hassall Grove
42.6 / 1k
Marsden Park
39.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hassall Grove
49
Marsden Park
185
Population
Hassall Grove
4,401
Marsden Park
14,610
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hassall Grove | Marsden Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.8/100 | 56.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.7/100 | 58.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.6 / 1k | 39.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 42 | 123 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 49 | 185 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 51 |
| Population | 4,401 | 14,610 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Hassall Grove is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Marsden Park is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Hassall Grove tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Marsden Park stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Marsden Park, while Hassall Grove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.