Overall score
Huntingfield
45.1/100
Kingston
57.7/100
Huntingfield for families and schools; Kingston for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Huntingfield
45.1/100
Kingston
57.7/100
Crime rate
Huntingfield
2435.0 / 1k
Kingston
107.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Huntingfield
26
Kingston
90
Population
Huntingfield
540
Kingston
12,288
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Huntingfield | Kingston |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.1/100 | 57.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 2435.0 / 1k | 107.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 20 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 64 |
| Walkability | 6.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 90 |
| Population | 540 | 12,288 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Huntingfield is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, and Kingston is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Kingston sits among greener hillside streets, while Huntingfield keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Huntingfield tends to lead on improving crime trends, while Kingston stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Huntingfield sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Kingston.
On balance, value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kingston, while Huntingfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.