Overall score
Kelso
64.9/100
South Bathurst
47.7/100
Kelso for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kelso
64.9/100
South Bathurst
47.7/100
Crime rate
Kelso
94.6 / 1k
South Bathurst
94.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kelso
167
South Bathurst
58
Population
Kelso
10,039
South Bathurst
1,583
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kelso | South Bathurst |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.9/100 | 47.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 88.3/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.6 / 1k | 94.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 283 | 65 |
| Walkability | 71.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 167 | 58 |
| Planning activity | 41 | 12 |
| Population | 10,039 | 1,583 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 2/10 |
Kelso is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, while South Bathurst is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
On the data, Kelso is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; South Bathurst answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kelso, while South Bathurst remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.