Overall score
King Scrub
65.3/100
Mount Pleasant
55.6/100
King Scrub for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
King Scrub
65.3/100
Mount Pleasant
55.6/100
Crime rate
King Scrub
8.9 / 1k
Mount Pleasant
11.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
King Scrub
1
Mount Pleasant
1
Population
King Scrub
363
Mount Pleasant
390
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | King Scrub | Mount Pleasant |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.3/100 | 55.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 81.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.9 / 1k | 11.1 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 1 |
| Population | 363 | 390 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, King Scrub is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Mount Pleasant is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Pleasant sits among greener hillside streets, while King Scrub keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, King Scrub is stronger for housing affordability and overall desirability; Mount Pleasant answers with a quieter safety profile and a larger local community.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer King Scrub, while Mount Pleasant remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.