Overall score
Kings Meadows
61.4/100
Prospect
50.6/100
Kings Meadows vs Prospect, TAS suburb comparison
Prospect for investment and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kings MeadowsProspect
Crime rate
Kings Meadows
1890.3 / 1k
Prospect
4326.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kings Meadows
152
Prospect
26
Population
Kings Meadows
4,359
Prospect
1,908
Metric leadKings Meadows 7Prospect 3across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kings Meadows | Prospect |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.4/100 | 50.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 82.5/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 1890.3 / 1k | 4326.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 27 | 11 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 41.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 152 | 26 |
| Population | 4,359 | 1,908 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Kings Meadows is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Prospect is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
On the data, Kings Meadows is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Prospect answers with housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Kings Meadows generally means more approachable housing costs, while Prospect leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, investors are more likely to prefer Prospect, while Kings Meadows remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.