Kippa-Ring vs Redcliffe, QLD suburb comparison

Kippa-Ring for investment; Redcliffe for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kippa-RingRedcliffe

Overall score

Kippa-Ring

57.5/100

Redcliffe

66.5/100

Crime rate

Kippa-Ring

92.5 / 1k

Redcliffe

46.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kippa-Ring

226

Redcliffe

365

Population

Kippa-Ring

9,745

Redcliffe

10,460

Metric leadKippa-Ring 2Redcliffe 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKippa-RingRedcliffe
Overall score57.5/10066.5/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10068.9/100
Crime rate92.5 / 1k46.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Parks & reserves129
Public transport stops4153
Walkability82.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities226365
Population9,74510,460
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Kippa-Ring is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Redcliffe is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Redcliffe is shaped by the coast, Kippa-Ring offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Kippa-Ring pulls ahead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, whereas Redcliffe is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

Choose Kippa-Ring if you are weighing investors; lean toward Redcliffe for retirees and families.

Related comparisons