Overall score
Kippa-Ring
57.5/100
Redcliffe
66.5/100
Kippa-Ring for investment; Redcliffe for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kippa-Ring
57.5/100
Redcliffe
66.5/100
Crime rate
Kippa-Ring
92.5 / 1k
Redcliffe
46.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kippa-Ring
226
Redcliffe
365
Population
Kippa-Ring
9,745
Redcliffe
10,460
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kippa-Ring | Redcliffe |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.5/100 | 66.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 68.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 92.5 / 1k | 46.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 41 | 53 |
| Walkability | 82.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 226 | 365 |
| Population | 9,745 | 10,460 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 2/10 |
Kippa-Ring is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Redcliffe is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Redcliffe is shaped by the coast, Kippa-Ring offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
Kippa-Ring pulls ahead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, whereas Redcliffe is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.
Choose Kippa-Ring if you are weighing investors; lean toward Redcliffe for retirees and families.