Lockyer vs Robinson, WA suburb comparison

Lockyer for families and investment; Robinson for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LockyerRobinson

Overall score

Lockyer

39.7/100

Robinson

26.3/100

Crime rate

Lockyer

2539.9 / 1k

Robinson

4791.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lockyer

2

Robinson

0

Population

Lockyer

1,298

Robinson

696

Metric leadLockyer 7Robinson 1across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLockyerRobinson
Overall score39.7/10026.3/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10050.9/100
Crime rate2539.9 / 1k4791.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools6
Public transport stops83
Walkability12.0/1004.5/100
Nearby amenities20
Population1,298696
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lockyer is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Robinson is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

On the data, Lockyer is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Robinson answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Lockyer sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Robinson.

Families and investors may find Lockyer the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Robinson.

Related comparisons