Overall score
Mitchell
36.6/100
Windradyne
51.3/100
Mitchell for families and schools; Windradyne for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mitchell
36.6/100
Windradyne
51.3/100
Crime rate
Mitchell
94.4 / 1k
Windradyne
94.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mitchell
87
Windradyne
59
Population
Mitchell
1,179
Windradyne
3,309
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mitchell | Windradyne |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.6/100 | 51.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 69.9/100 | 84.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.4 / 1k | 94.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 30 | 74 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 72.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 87 | 59 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 13 |
| Population | 1,179 | 3,309 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
Mitchell is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Windradyne is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
On the data, Mitchell is stronger for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities; Windradyne answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves. Mitchell generally means more approachable housing costs, while Windradyne leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Windradyne, while Mitchell remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.