Overall score
Mount Gambier
67.1/100
Suttontown
32.7/100
Mount Gambier for families and schools; Suttontown for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Gambier
67.1/100
Suttontown
32.7/100
Crime rate
Mount Gambier
67.0 / 1k
Suttontown
64.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Gambier
554
Suttontown
0
Population
Mount Gambier
25,591
Suttontown
692
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Gambier | Suttontown |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.1/100 | 32.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.7/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 67.0 / 1k | 64.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 20 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 121 | 1 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 554 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 198 | 71 |
| Population | 25,591 | 692 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 7/10 |
Mount Gambier reads as a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks; Suttontown is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Mount Gambier sits among greener hillside streets, while Suttontown keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Gambier is stronger for schools and education options and public transport access; Suttontown answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Mount Gambier generally means more approachable housing costs, while Suttontown leans toward more sought-after housing.
Mount Gambier suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Suttontown is the stronger match for retirees and investors.