Mount Gambier vs Suttontown, SA Suburb Comparison

Mount Gambier for retirees and families; Suttontown for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount GambierSuttontown

Overall score

Mount Gambier

51.5/100

Suttontown

33.5/100

Crime rate

Mount Gambier

58.7 / 1k

Suttontown

66.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Gambier

565

Suttontown

2

Population

Mount Gambier

25,591

Suttontown

692

Metric leadMount Gambier 9Suttontown 21 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount GambierSuttontown
Overall score51.5/10033.5/100
Housing (desirability)70.8/10058.8/100
Crime rate58.7 / 1k66.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools202
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops1211
Walkability100.0/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities5652
Planning activity23878
Green cover8.0%0.2%
Population25,591692
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/107/10

Comparison summary

Mount Gambier reads as a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks; Suttontown is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Mount Gambier sits among greener hillside streets, while Suttontown keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Gambier is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access; Suttontown answers with housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Mount Gambier generally means more approachable housing costs, while Suttontown leans toward more sought-after housing.

Mount Gambier suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Suttontown is the stronger match for retirees and investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons