Paddington vs Woollahra, NSW suburb comparison

Paddington for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PaddingtonWoollahra

Overall score

Paddington

66.9/100

Woollahra

59.6/100

Crime rate

Paddington

75.8 / 1k

Woollahra

37.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Paddington

505

Woollahra

434

Population

Paddington

12,701

Woollahra

7,189

Metric leadPaddington 7Woollahra 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPaddingtonWoollahra
Overall score66.9/10059.6/100
Housing (desirability)4.8/1003.9/100
Crime rate75.8 / 1k37.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1817
Parks & reserves1411
Public transport stops4649
Walkability100.0/10085.0/100
Nearby amenities505434
Planning activity14666
Population12,7017,189
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Paddington is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Woollahra is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Paddington pulls ahead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, whereas Woollahra is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Paddington, while Woollahra remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons