Raglan vs White Rock, NSW suburb comparison

Raglan for investment; White Rock for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RaglanWhite Rock

Overall score

Raglan

43.8/100

White Rock

45.8/100

Crime rate

Raglan

94.6 / 1k

White Rock

94.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Raglan

56

White Rock

2

Population

Raglan

1,272

White Rock

807

Metric leadRaglan 4White Rock 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRaglanWhite Rock
Overall score43.8/10045.8/100
Housing (desirability)88.3/10081.8/100
Crime rate94.6 / 1k94.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops4761
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities562
Planning activity104
Population1,272807
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Raglan is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and White Rock is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Raglan is stronger for housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities; White Rock answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access. On housing, Raglan sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in White Rock.

Investors may find Raglan the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer White Rock.

Related comparisons