Overall score
Ravenswood
32.3/100
Shelbourne
44.9/100
Shelbourne for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ravenswood
32.3/100
Shelbourne
44.9/100
Crime rate
Ravenswood
133.5 / 1k
Shelbourne
20.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ravenswood
0
Shelbourne
0
Population
Ravenswood
443
Shelbourne
423
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ravenswood | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.3/100 | 44.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 79.7/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 133.5 / 1k | 20.2 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 9 |
| Population | 443 | 423 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Ravenswood is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Shelbourne is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Ravenswood pulls ahead on a larger local community, whereas Shelbourne is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Shelbourne, while Ravenswood remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.