Ropes Crossing vs Tregear, NSW suburb comparison

Ropes Crossing for retirees and investment; Tregear for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Ropes CrossingTregear

Overall score

Ropes Crossing

49.9/100

Tregear

44.2/100

Crime rate

Ropes Crossing

123.6 / 1k

Tregear

194.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ropes Crossing

97

Tregear

68

Population

Ropes Crossing

7,280

Tregear

3,700

Metric leadRopes Crossing 7Tregear 4across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRopes CrossingTregear
Overall score49.9/10044.2/100
Housing (desirability)51.3/10032.9/100
Crime rate123.6 / 1k194.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools211
Parks & reserves23
Public transport stops4968
Walkability55.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities9768
Planning activity21
Population7,2803,700
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Ropes Crossing is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Tregear is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Ropes Crossing is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Tregear answers with parks and reserves and public transport access. Ropes Crossing generally means more sought-after housing, while Tregear leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Ropes Crossing, while Tregear remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons