Ruse vs Woodbine, NSW suburb comparison

Ruse for investment and value; Woodbine for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RuseWoodbine

Overall score

Ruse

51.4/100

Woodbine

43.2/100

Crime rate

Ruse

123.4 / 1k

Woodbine

123.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ruse

52

Woodbine

34

Population

Ruse

5,632

Woodbine

2,780

Metric leadRuse 7Woodbine 13 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRuseWoodbine
Overall score51.4/10043.2/100
Housing (desirability)61.0/10061.0/100
Crime rate123.4 / 1k123.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1010
Parks & reserves92
Public transport stops5551
Walkability55.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities5234
Planning activity35
Population5,6322,780
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/104/10

Comparison summary

Ruse is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Woodbine is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Ruse sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Woodbine is further out with more breathing room.

Ruse tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Woodbine stands out for excellent public transport and an emerging neighbourhood.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Ruse, while Woodbine remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons