Seacombe Gardens vs Warradale, SA suburb comparison

Seacombe Gardens for investment and value; Warradale for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Seacombe GardensWarradale

Overall score

Seacombe Gardens

55.3/100

Warradale

60.3/100

Crime rate

Seacombe Gardens

27.1 / 1k

Warradale

27.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Seacombe Gardens

63

Warradale

113

Population

Seacombe Gardens

3,373

Warradale

5,801

Metric leadSeacombe Gardens 2Warradale 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySeacombe GardensWarradale
Overall score55.3/10060.3/100
Housing (desirability)71.6/10037.8/100
Crime rate27.1 / 1k27.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools34
Public transport stops1431
Walkability40.0/10078.0/100
Nearby amenities63113
Planning activity3760
Population3,3735,801
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Seacombe Gardens is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Warradale is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Seacombe Gardens is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Warradale answers with schools and education options and public transport access.

Choose Seacombe Gardens if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Warradale for retirees and families.

Related comparisons