Seacombe Gardens vs Warradale, SA Suburb Comparison

Seacombe Gardens for families and investment; Warradale for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Seacombe GardensWarradale

Overall score

Seacombe Gardens

39.3/100

Warradale

50.1/100

Crime rate

Seacombe Gardens

39.6 / 1k

Warradale

27.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Seacombe Gardens

66

Warradale

115

Population

Seacombe Gardens

3,373

Warradale

5,801

Metric leadSeacombe Gardens 3Warradale 81 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySeacombe GardensWarradale
Overall score39.3/10050.1/100
Housing (desirability)79.3/10066.8/100
Crime rate39.6 / 1k27.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools34
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops1431
Walkability40.0/10078.0/100
Nearby amenities66115
Planning activity4575
Green cover3.5%1.9%
Population3,3735,801
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Seacombe Gardens is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Warradale is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Seacombe Gardens is stronger for housing affordability, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook; Warradale answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access.

Choose Seacombe Gardens if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Warradale for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons