Overall score
Seacombe Gardens
55.3/100
Warradale
60.3/100
Seacombe Gardens for investment and value; Warradale for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Seacombe Gardens
55.3/100
Warradale
60.3/100
Crime rate
Seacombe Gardens
27.1 / 1k
Warradale
27.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Seacombe Gardens
63
Warradale
113
Population
Seacombe Gardens
3,373
Warradale
5,801
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Seacombe Gardens | Warradale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.3/100 | 60.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 71.6/100 | 37.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 27.1 / 1k | 27.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 14 | 31 |
| Walkability | 40.0/100 | 78.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 63 | 113 |
| Planning activity | 37 | 60 |
| Population | 3,373 | 5,801 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Seacombe Gardens is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Warradale is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Seacombe Gardens is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Warradale answers with schools and education options and public transport access.
Choose Seacombe Gardens if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Warradale for retirees and families.