St Helens vs Swansea, TAS suburb comparison

St Helens for investment; Swansea for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

St HelensSwansea

Overall score

St Helens

24.7/100

Swansea

26.0/100

Crime rate

St Helens

138.4 / 1k

Swansea

864.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

St Helens

0

Swansea

0

Population

St Helens

2,206

Swansea

997

Metric leadSt Helens 4Swansea 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySt HelensSwansea
Overall score24.7/10026.0/100
Housing (desirability)15.2/10010.6/100
Crime rate138.4 / 1k864.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves71
Public transport stops26
Walkability3.0/1009.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Population2,206997
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

St Helens is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Swansea is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Swansea leans into coastal living, while St Helens feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, St Helens is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Swansea answers with public transport access and walkability.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find St Helens the better fit, while families and people chasing a beach lifestyle are more likely to prefer Swansea.

Related comparisons