Aberdare vs Nulkaba, NSW suburb comparison

Nulkaba for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AberdareNulkaba

Overall score

Aberdare

34.4/100

Nulkaba

41.1/100

Crime rate

Aberdare

96.7 / 1k

Nulkaba

96.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aberdare

21

Nulkaba

68

Population

Aberdare

2,542

Nulkaba

715

Metric leadAberdare 4Nulkaba 7across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAberdareNulkaba
Overall score34.4/10041.1/100
Housing (desirability)66.1/10068.2/100
Crime rate96.7 / 1k96.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools32
Parks & reserves31
Public transport stops6835
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities2168
Planning activity138
Population2,542715
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/107/10

Comparison summary

Aberdare reads as a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible; Nulkaba is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Aberdare sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Nulkaba is more regionally self-contained.

On the data, Aberdare is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Nulkaba answers with housing affordability and walkability. Aberdare generally means more approachable housing costs, while Nulkaba leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Nulkaba, while Aberdare remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons